User Tools
Writing /app/www/public/data/meta/onboarding/introduction/introduction_to_das_networks.meta failed
onboarding:introduction:introduction_to_das_networks
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| onboarding:introduction:introduction_to_das_networks [2017/05/18 12:30] – mmcc | onboarding:introduction:introduction_to_das_networks [2021/06/25 10:09] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Introduction to DAS Networks ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Author: Michelle McCausland | ||
| + | |||
| + | Excerpts taken from presentation given by Stephen Shotts - Errigal U - Wireless Telecom & DAS Primer - November 2015 | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | **DAS** - Stands for Distributed Antenna Systems | ||
| + | * A single traditional “tower” is replaced by smaller, typically fiber-fed, remote amplifiers. | ||
| + | * DAS is widely used indoors and outdoors - in hotels, shopping centers, stadiums. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Pros:** | ||
| + | * Less loss between amplifier and antenna (requiring lower power). | ||
| + | * Signal can be placed more exactly. | ||
| + | * Hardware supports “neutral host” configuration. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Cons:** | ||
| + | * Installation costs are higher compared to an average tower. | ||
| + | * Maintenance costs are higher (more nodes, fiber repairs are costly). | ||
| + | * Added complexity (multiple vendors and configurations). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Currently 74,000 active DAS nodes deployed in the US.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Crown Castle – A traditional tower company** | ||
| + | * 28,000 DAS “Nodes” including “Extension Units” | ||
| + | * Acquisitions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **ExteNet Systems** | ||
| + | * 8,000 DAS “Nodes” including “Extension Units” | ||
| + | * Acquisitions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Future Customer(s): | ||
| + | * American Tower Company | ||
| + | * 8,000 DAS “Nodes” + tower monitoring (lights, generators, etc.) | ||
| + | * Other smaller integrators, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | **DAS OEMs (hardware vendors)** | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Commscope (Andrew) – Hardware manufactured in Germany. | ||
| + | * Models: | ||
| + | * TE Connectivity (LGC, ADC, recently acquired by Commscope) – Based in San Jose. | ||
| + | * Models: LRCS, Prism, Fusion, Spectrum. | ||
| + | * Corning Mobile Access – Primarily only indoor DAS. | ||
| + | * Models: | ||
| + | * BravoTech Internaitonal (BTI) – Errigal worked with them to improve their SNMP Agent. | ||
| + | * Powerwave - Out of business, but hardware is still deployed. | ||
| + | * SOLiD – Made in Korea. | ||
| + | * Zinwave - Made in UK. Extremely poor SNMP agent design. | ||
| + | * Teko Telecom - Made in Italy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | NOTE: See the following page for more info on DAS and NON DAS OEMs: [[toolsandtechnologies: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ===== Self Assessment ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Assess your knowledge by seeing if you can answer the following questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - What does the term DAS stand for? | ||
| + | - Where are DAS systems used? | ||
| + | - What are some advantages of DAS systems? Name 2 | ||
| + | - What are some dis-advantages of DAS systems? Name 2 | ||
| + | - Approximately how many DAS nodes are actively used in the US? | ||
| + | - Name 3 DAS OEMs | ||